Day 119: Capitalism Part 7 - Remove children from criminal families at birth to save them from crime, says top judge

Article: Remove children from criminal families at birth to save them from crime, says top judge

"Babies born to prostitutes, drug addicts and other criminals should be adopted at birth to prevent them  following their parents into jail, a  leading judge has said.
Alan Goldsack QC, the Recorder of Sheffield, said it was the state’s duty to intervene to stop the ‘next generation of criminals’.
He said it was ‘frightening’ how many of the criminals he was sentencing today were the grandchildren of those he had dealt with 40 years ago.
‘Crime runs in families the same way that being a doctor, teacher or lawyer does,’ he said in an interview to mark his retirement.
‘Some people become criminals because they enjoy crime and think it’s a good way of life and if they don’t get caught they think they can have a good lifestyle.
‘But a frightening thing is the number of people I see who are the grandchildren of the people I have prosecuted and defended 40 years ago.’
The state had to ‘remove young babies from the families that are going to produce the next generation of  criminals’, he said.
He added that a dysfunctional family would often have £250,000 spent on them, ‘but if we get in early and removed children we could save thousands’.
He said a ‘huge proportion’ of prisoners were a ‘product of the care system’.

Camila Batmanghelidjh, founder of the charity Kids Company, said taking children from criminal families was not the right solution
Camila Batmanghelidjh, founder of Kids Company, said: ‘This protest is directed at the wrong corner of the problem.
'If you look at the baby in their cot, they are not a criminal. Taking babies from parents because they happen to be in criminal families is not the right solution.
'We need to address the way that we work with disturbed families and children.’
Alison Worsley of Barnardo’s said the Government needed to do more to support children of prisoners."

So what is the problem with the solution suggested by this judge? Let us firstly place ourselves in the shows of someone who becomes a criminal - For varying reasons - people are either forced into criminal activities or choose to do so to have better lives. For example what he is referring to as prostitutes and other people who have chosen a live of crime - if one were to really take a look inside the life of a person who chose crime over starvation, you will find that a large percentage of children born into this world - who end up with career choices that are 'against the law' did not grow up thinking they want to necessarily 'break laws and place themselves into dangerous, health risking situations, shortening their life spans, for the rest of their lives. Most of these individuals for those who do their research realized that a) in the current money system they require to obtain a piece of paper or else they do not get access to food, fresh water a roof over their heads and a life style that they see most other people in their communities get to have - such as clothing, cars, jewelry, a social life etc. Therefore socio-economic situations are in a large percentage of the cases the reason behind why a human would ignore societal and religion issues of morality and turn towards careers that are indeed profitable.

Many people say that they will never turn to things like drug selling/smuggling/trafficking/robberies or prostitution - but imagine you were never raised with indoctrination about right/wrong, good/bad, hell/heaven and you become a young adult and now the rules of the system are quite clear -do or die. Is it really the place for any person to firstly blame these people who realize they have to work for a piece of paper to survive - who then follow where they are able to get jobs - and do so - who are we as society to judge the reasoning for a person for having to survive?

So lets consider the points that the judge missed as he swooped past self-responsibility to 'take babies away from people' Firstly - as we have already covered earlier -isn the fact that we have equated life to survival and to survive you need a piece of paper - and the rules in society are quite clear about this.

Secondly, if these masses of individuals are finding all of these jobs because they are better paying than 'ordinary', acceptable career/job choices and the market for these 'services' are so vast that there are basically jobs for alot of people within one city/society - should we not then rather turn our focus to the understanding and realization that the problem indeed exists around the fact that these people who have to now survive by obtaining a piece of paper - with issues of morality removed either through choice or through it not existing within the individual in the first place - where they then have all of these job opportunities available to commit these crimes - is because we as the public (who like to blame and point fingers) are the customers and consumers? There would not be such a problem of people turning to crime such as drug dealing, prostitution, child trafficking, war etc - if it were not for the vast amounts of people who actually use these services - so again here we are faced with the lack of responsibility within the public - where we are actually asking for these services and then blame the younger generation for who survival in the system to get pieces of paper to have access to resources  - is getting harder and harder!

So here we have already seen 2 points from which society and the individual who judges and the politicians and the lawmakers have completely run away from, and ignored. Instead we look 'ahead'' - away from the original cause of why these individuals chose a life of crime instead of working in sweat shops in condemned buildings or at MacDonald's, for minimum wages, for the rest of their lives...



INSTEAD of addressing for example the rules and principled of capitalism which drive people to extremes to survive, and the extensive brainwashing that happens every day by our permission, through the media  - where people are brainwashed to believe that they must have the life styles of the rich, as it is portrayed through constantly showing the opposite polarities of 'have/not have - to be the complete and ultimate desire of any and all human beings - we instead say 'lets rather take their children away'. That is why when you speak about Equality - you will be shot down, even by spiritualists and people who discuss conspiracy theories about 'the system' and those who claim to want to 'save humanity'. Why? Because the brainwashing around the separation between rich and poor has become so acceptable  - that NOBODY is willing to admit that they see and understand that if we constantly portray the life of the rich as something desirable and that you have to either be born into it, work like a slave to get to it or steal it - then you are just not going to ever experience the enjoyment of what it means to 'have'. There has been so much emphasis programmed into the human - about the emotional and energetic experience of being rich - that nobody wants to let go of this polarity - everybody still desires to be the one who has alot of money and this experience of having more/having a special life style is only possible if we have an opposite polarity of the 'have not's/ the poor/ those who live with only the basics.



Therefore one can say what you want - but if one still believe that our lives here are meant to be lived to try and obtain happiness through obtaining more money than others and to have a life style that is 'special' which means others dont get to have it - then obviously in common sense one sees that the programming of oneself is extensive - in how one has categorized your own value systems to suit your secret desires for a happiness point found within this polarity game of rich versus poor.

Therefore what we are seeing here through the words of this judge, is again an example of how we will deliberately find ways to protect those who have money by finding ways of controlling those who want money - just like we see on the billboards and in the magazines every second of every day. This 'judge' for example, does not want us to solve the original cause of why people turn to crime, the thought process that play a decisive role in why someone turns to a life style of crime - he instead wants to remove children from criminals so that we have a point of relieve within the system - a way of feeling 'ok' that we have yet again moved further and further away from actually stopping the problem - where we basically 'get to keep the problem'. So - what happens to these children - they are again inserted into the same system that forces them to either work hard for the money or choose a life of crime. And isn't that the same decision their parents were faced with?


Further Research:

Economist's Journey to Life

Day 41: International Crime Research: Education Fraud Part 3 – the Textbook Deception

This is a follow up on: http://crimesjourneytolife.blogspot.com/2012/09/day-40-international-crime-research.html#


I suggest watch the following Documentary:


The College Conspiracy


From the transcription of the Documentary I will draw information for the application of self-forgiveness on the current Education System of the World:

 

“Colleges are now charging two hundred dollars for each single textbook that has no resell value because they put out a new slightly revised versions with a new name each year. The textbook publishers are even colluding with college bookstores to make custom textbooks so that students can't save money by buying them online. Colleges are getting kickbacks from publishers in order to destroy the used textbook market, which by itself is proof enough that college administrators are only interested in lining their own pockets and have no interest in helping students.”


(Gerald Celente from Trends Research Institute) “You have to have a certain kind of brain to understandings the dead language that they wright in text books, but they brainwashed you from, from a little kid up so that you buy into the system and you get good grades and you study hard, then you become a member of the total system - no freedom and you don’t know how to think, because they told you have a think their way”.

I forgive myself for having accepted and allowed myself to attached values to ‘things costing more’ and making these values about pride and accomplishment and so not only giving permission to the existence of abuse and manipulation in the name of money – but also giving permission for the next generation of children/people to be led down the same path – wherein within the Capitalistic System they will be subject to whatever new rules and laws are implemented -which are ALWAYS about feeding the pockets of the rich at the expense of the rest of the population.


I forgive myself for accepting and allowing myself to attach a good positive feeling and value to ‘feeding the pockets of the rich’ as I have come to believe as I have been brainwashed from youth – that Money is the highest Value one can attain – (obviously above Life itself or else we would not justify abuse to Life) – and through this belief that to be rich is a utmost desirable outcome and the game between rich and poor is a valid expression and occupation of the Human existence – have already given permission to any and all new tactics that the rich/elite/those who control money can and will come up with as the Money Markets crash and new ways have to be found for Money to be made from the worker/consumer.


I commit myself to show how a simple thing like ‘price hikes’ is in essence not simple – but another example of how those with money do not have to pay any price for how they direct global money and economies –and that every step taken by the governments, the banks, the corporations, the lawmakers – where the people at the bottom pay the price – is always about manipulating and abusing the individual to give more and act in accordance with the world economic systems that by design are about feeding the riches of the Minority.


I commit myself to show how we as the individual merely sit in a conveyer belt we have come to call the system of Life or is it Life as a system – and that we watch as all these small points are implemented – but as soon as the picture goes by you forget how and what was done to exploit the individual, the resources and the lives of the people who make money movement possible.

Therefore I commit to show that the only reason why we allow ourselves to sit on this conveyer belt that someone else is operating on our behalf – where we stare at the scenery but ‘forget’ as soon as the last picture is out of sight’ is because each person is trapped within the world system which they depend on for Life or Death – where we KNOW that we are deliberately pretending to not see the whole picture as all the picture that have gone past us while we sit on the conveyer belt – because to speak up about all the pictures you have seen and what it really means –is the same as going to your boss and saying listen I quit or even worse ‘listen I will continue to work but please don’t pay me’.

Therefore I commit myself to show that people do see, realize and understand on some level most of what is going on as your average person has the basic ability to use a one plus one equals two equations to add up the lies we are fed and the existence of ourselves – to see, realize and understand the actuality of what is happening in the world and our role in it.

Therefore I commit myself to show that all humans whom to whatever extend ignore the truth of our reality (one plus one equals two) do so out of complete fear of survival – and that (as used in the boss analogy) to say ‘I do not accept the system as it is’ is within the mind of the being almost like a signed, committed death sentence for yourself and your family – which is unbearable.

I commit myself to show how this Fear is unnecessary when one realizes that if firstly we implement a new system that removes the problems that exist now and each human agrees to live and apply this way of living – and each one start now through self change and participation in the implementation and goal designs of a new system – then we are preparing the way for a new world – all together – where a few do not have to worry that they will remove themselves from the system to be able to stand up – but to be part of the step by step implementation – which involves the design firstly and the self change – until most are ready to implement the system of change.

Please investigate the Equal Money System and vote on the Goals – and share your perspectives:

http://equalmoney.org/